Verified Results (Revised): FXEA365 Tested All Strategies on MT5 with 132 Files — 5 Variants Passed (1 Core + 2 Support + 2 Martingale)
Contents
- How the Correction Came About
- Final Verification Results — MT5 Live Strategy Tester 132 HTM Files
- Passed Live Thresholds (PF≥1.5 & trades≥50 & DD≤30% & net profit positive)
- Failed (Major Categories)
- Why These 5 Variants Passed
- BLAZE GOLD v2 (XAUUSD)
- AUSSIE BB REVERT v2.1 (AUDUSD)
- EURJPY ASIA BREAKOUT 10-year edition
- Two Martingale EAs (AUDUSD/EURJPY KAMIKAZE)
- Industry-Level Lessons (Unchanged from Original)
- Important New Lessons from the Correction
- FXEA365 Policy (Revised)
- A Note to Our Readers: Correction and Apology
- Public Verification Data
Verified Results (Revised): FXEA365 Tested All Strategies on MT5 with 132 Files — 5 Variants Passed (1 Core + 2 Support + 2 Martingale)
This is the FXEA365 operator.
This article is a revised edition correcting errors discovered on the same day as the original publication on 2026-05-28.
The original version reported "1 out of 25 passed (4%)," but after fixing a bug in our HTM report parsing script that miscalculated DD%, a recount revealed that 5 variants (1 core + 2 support + 2 martingale) actually passed live performance thresholds (PF≥1.5 / trades≥50 / DD≤30%). We are issuing this official correction.
How the Correction Came About
- During the initial verification, the Python parser failed to correctly extract the DD% from the MT5 Japanese locale format "残高最大ドローダウン: 594.58 (5.67%)". As a result, EAs that should have been filtered out by the DD≤30% criterion were incorrectly evaluated, leading to the conclusion that "only BLAZE GOLD v2 qualifies with PF≥1.5."
- Re-parsing with a separate implementation (UTF-16 LE + Japanese labels
プロフィットファクター:/残高最大ドローダウン:) revealed that AUSSIE BB REVERT v2.1 and EURJPY ASIA BREAKOUT 10-year edition had in fact passed with PF=1.52 / 50-79 trades / DD≤4%. - Simultaneously, we confirmed that the martingale EA retest sessions (AUDUSD/EURJPY KAMIKAZE) had produced outstanding figures of PF=1.81/2.09 with 994/1731 trades.
Final Verification Results — MT5 Live Strategy Tester 132 HTM Files
Passed Live Thresholds (PF≥1.5 & trades≥50 & DD≤30% & net profit positive)
| Rank | EA | Pair/TF | Period | Live PF | Live DD% | Net Profit | Trades | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core | BLAZE GOLD v2 | XAUUSD H1 | 2019-2024 (6yr) | 1.90 | 5.75% | +$1,533 | 74 | 55.4% |
| Core (alt period) | Same v20_final | XAUUSD H1 | 2021-2025 (5yr) | 1.87 | 5.67% | +$1,181 | 60 | 58.3% |
| Support 1 | EURJPY ASIA BREAKOUT 10-year | EURJPY H1 | 2016-2025 (10yr) | 1.52 | 4.0% | +$6,777 | 79 | 37.97% |
| Support 2 | AUSSIE BB REVERT v2.1 | AUDUSD H1 | 2021-2025 (5yr) | 1.52 | 2.92% | +$316 | 50 | 58.0% |
| Martingale 1 | AUDUSD NANPIN KAMIKAZE (retest) | AUDUSD H1 | 2022-2025 (4yr) | 1.81 | 7.0% | +$47,914 | 994 | 85.81% |
| Martingale 2 | EURJPY NANPIN KAMIKAZE (retest) | EURJPY H1 | 2022-2025 (4yr) | 2.09 | 4.0% | +$109,091 | 1,731 | 78.39% |
Failed (Major Categories)
| Category | EA Group | Result |
|---|---|---|
| MEGAMAX multi-currency (9 EAs) | AUDUSD/CADJPY/EURUSD/GBPJPY/GBPUSD/NZDJPY/USDCAD/USDCHF/USDJPY | All PF=0.57-0.59 / DD≈99.96% / complete account wipeout |
| BLAZE multi-currency (10 EAs) | AUDUSD/CADJPY/EURJPY/EURUSD/GBPJPY/GBPUSD/NZDJPY/USDCAD/USDCHF/USDJPY | All PF=0.25-0.67 / DD≈99-100% |
| GitHub geraked OSS (7 EAs) | BBRSI/3MAF/3MACD/2MACDSTO/2MOMEMA, etc. | All compiled variants PF<1.0; many had 0 trades |
| HYDRA ETH / PHOENIX SOL | Volatility Breakout | PF=0.70/0.58, DD=64%/95% |
| Morning Scalper v1/v2 | USDJPY M5 | PF=0.60-0.61 |
| Remaining 4 martingale EAs | USDJPY/GOLD/EURUSD/BTCUSD KAMIKAZE | PF=0.05-0.63, account wipeout |
Why These 5 Variants Passed
BLAZE GOLD v2 (XAUUSD)
- Entries only during the NY session at UTC 15:00, with an asymmetric design of SL=0.5 ATR / TP2=7.0 ATR
- Gold has low correlation with other assets and exhibits strong trends during NY hours — this is the source of the strategy's edge
AUSSIE BB REVERT v2.1 (AUDUSD)
- Trade frequency is low at 50 trades over 5 years, but with the v21_explicit settings (best value from the g2_04 grid), it achieved DD=2.92% / PF=1.52
- A Bollinger Band touch-reversal strategy optimized for AUDUSD's range-reversion characteristics
- ⚠ 50 trades is right at the lower limit for sample size; a 4-week demo forward test may only generate 2-4 trades
EURJPY ASIA BREAKOUT 10-year edition
- 10-year backtest from 2016-2025 with PF=1.52 / DD=4% / 79 trades
- Note: The 4-year version shows PF=2.96 / 38 trades, but insufficient sample size — the 10-year version was selected
- Captures EURJPY trend momentum as London session opens
Two Martingale EAs (AUDUSD/EURJPY KAMIKAZE)
- 994/1,731 trades over 4 years, with win rates of 85.81%/78.39% — typical of the high win rates seen in martingale strategies
- ⚠ Martingale strategies are designed for eventual account blowout. Even though the retest succeeded, the good results during the past 4 years were simply a tailwind from market conditions. Losses during sudden market shifts can be orders of magnitude larger
- Mandatory display of "Bankruptcy-risk strategy + daily withdrawal recommended" upon publication
Industry-Level Lessons (Unchanged from Original)
- Python BT / author-published figures ≠ live MT5 results (verified across gogojungle, GitHub, and our own EAs)
- "Thorough optimization" backfires (settings that passed 162K grid + WF + Monte Carlo performed worst on live testing)
- EAs that work depend on asset-specific characteristics (BLAZE GOLD works on XAUUSD, AUSSIE BB on AUDUSD, EURJPY ASIA on EURJPY — all of them failed when applied to other assets)
Important New Lessons from the Correction
- Parser bugs distort the entire evaluation — in this case, failure to extract DD% from a localized format led to the incorrect conclusion of "only 1 EA passes." Always cross-verify with an independently implemented parser.
- Fewer than 50 trades means no reliable conclusion — AUSSIE BB's 50 trades and EURJPY ASIA's 79 trades have low statistical reliability; additional verification with 4 weeks of demo forward testing is mandatory
- Never take past summaries at face value — summaries in notes or reports represent conclusions at the time of verification. When new parsers or new verification data emerge, re-evaluate immediately
FXEA365 Policy (Revised)
- Expanded public lineup: In addition to the core BLAZE GOLD v2, AUSSIE BB REVERT v2.1 and EURJPY ASIA BREAKOUT 10-year edition are now published as live-verified EAs
- Two martingale EAs reinstated: AUDUSD/EURJPY KAMIKAZE re-published under the bankruptcy-risk category
- 4-week demo forward testing conducted simultaneously for all 5: core + 2 support + 2 martingale
- Sales message corrected to: "We live-tested 132 HTM files from strategies around the world, and only 5 variants passed (1 core + 2 support + 2 martingale)"
- Parser double-verification: Going forward, all verification data will be re-parsed by an independent implementation before finalizing figures
A Note to Our Readers: Correction and Apology
The original article stating "only 1 EA passed (4%)" may have been read by multiple people before we could correct it. That conclusion was an error caused by a parser bug. The actual live verification data shows that AUSSIE BB REVERT v2.1, EURJPY ASIA BREAKOUT 10-year edition, and the two martingale EAs all met the passing threshold. We are issuing this official correction.
When purchasing or using any EA, please continue to verify the following:
- MT5 Strategy Tester live data is publicly disclosed
- PF≥1.5 maintained across multiple periods (5yr/10yr)
- Forward-tested on a demo account for 4 weeks to confirm reproducibility
- At least 50 trades in the sample
- DD≤30% (recommended ≤15%)
Public Verification Data
- BLAZE GOLD v2 details: https://fxea365.com/ea/blaze-gold
- AUSSIE BB REVERT v2.1 details: https://fxea365.com/ea/aussie-bb-revert
- EURJPY ASIA BREAKOUT details: Coming soon
- Martingale EAs: https://fxea365.com/ea/ranking (martingale category)
- Forward test progress: https://fxea365.com/forward-test
FXEA365 — An MT5 EA distribution service differentiated by honest, empirical data. All figures in this article are live measurements from MT5 Strategy Tester across 132 HTM files.
Related
2026-07-15
Real Ticks vs 1-Minute OHLC: Why the Same EA Gives Opposite Results
2026-07-15
MT4 vs MT5 for EAs (2026): Why Real-Tick Testing Decides It
2026-07-07
AutoTrading Disabled in MT5: Fix Retcodes 10027 & 10026 (EA Not Trading)
2026-07-07
Invalid Stops in MT5: Fix Retcode 10016 & MT4 Error 130
5-Day Email Course (Free)
Get one email a day covering the essentials of FX automated trading, how to read backtests correctly, and tips for choosing a broker.
* Privacy strictly protected. You can unsubscribe at any time.