⚖️ EA Comparison Tool
Compare 2-4 EAs side by side. The EA with the best value for each metric is highlighted.
📋 Select EAs to compare (3/4)
GOLD VIPER バランス運用
XAUUSD M30 volatility-regime breakout [Balanced tier] | 22.5yr 100% real tick: PF 1.25 / 43.5% win / 28.9% eqDD / 22.5% yr | Ships at this setting (RunMode=Standard) — hard SL, no martingale. 11 of 23 years were losing years
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, micro-account) Honest M1 every-tick 8.5yr: PF 4.50 / equity DD 7.0% (balance 2.2%) / +38.5% / 35 trades. Small-capital variant of the GLACIER engine
ETHEREUM EA
★ ETHEREUM EA (ETHUSD H4 trend, both directions) Dukascopy real ticks 7.5yr (2019-2026): PF 3.98 / eqDD 8.5% (balance 6.3%) / +223% / 93 trades (v1.30 genetic walk-forward EC23/ATR3/BM1.25 - optimized on 2018-23, validated untouched on 2024-26, both windows PF3+)
| Metric | GOLD VIPER バランス運用 | BITCOIN NANO | ETHEREUM EA |
|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)Gross profit ÷ gross loss. 1.5 or higher recommended | 1.25 | 🏆4.50 | 3.98 |
| Annual return (CAGR/simple %)Annual return (shown value calculated from 10-yr BT) | 🏆+22.5% | +3.9% | +16.9% |
| Max DDLargest account drawdown (lower is better) | 28.90% | 🏆6.95% | 14.00% |
| Win Rate | 43.5% | 🏆51.4% | 43.0% |
| Trades/YearNumber of trades per year | 🏆844trades | 35trades | 93trades |
| Calmar (annual ÷ DD)Risk-adjusted return (higher is better) | 0.78 | 0.56 | 🏆1.21 |
| 10-yr simple-interest projection (from $670) | 🏆$32,500 | $13,900 | $26,900 |
| 10-yr compound projection (from $670) | 🏆$76,100 | $14,700 | $32,300 |
💡 Comparison Summary
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- Annual return (CAGR/simple %):GOLD VIPER バランス運用 (XAUUSD)
- Max DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- Win Rate:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- Trades/Year:GOLD VIPER バランス運用 (XAUUSD)
- Calmar (annual ÷ DD):ETHEREUM EA (ETHUSD)
- 10-yr simple-interest projection (from $670):GOLD VIPER バランス運用 (XAUUSD)
- 10-yr compound projection (from $670):GOLD VIPER バランス運用 (XAUUSD)