⚖️ EA比較工具
並列比較2〜4個EA。在各指標上以醒目顯示最高值的EA。
📋 選擇要比較的EA (4/4)
BITCOIN COMET
★ BITCOIN COMET EA (BTCUSD H4 dual-direction trend-follow) Real MT5 8.0yr (2018.01-2025/every-tick) PF=2.77 / DD=7.1% / +1370% total / 137 trades / Sharpe 1.81 (robust across both OOS halves)
TRINITY
★ TRINITY — 用單一 .ex5 同時趨勢交易 BTC+ETH+USDJPY 的單一多資產EA。每個商品硬停損(= ATR追蹤寬度)、每商品一倉、無網格、無馬丁。三種資產近乎零相關，平滑回落。與 BITCOIN COMET / MEGAMAX 同一引擎系列。單一$10k帳戶、標準風險(2/2/0.5)、Exness實盤測試2019-2025：+1,778% / PF 2.20 / 最大回落10.46% / 307筆。MT5 · MT4。
SOLANA COMET
SOLANA COMET EA (SOLUSD H4 dual-direction Donchian trend) — same proven COMET engine as Bitcoin, applied to Solana. Dukascopy 2021-2026: PF 2.72 / +84% / maxDD 10.2% / 85 trades, both directions. ⚠ High variance: the edge is concentrated in trending/volatile SOL regimes (2021-2023); 2024-2025 were ~flat. Hard SL, no grid, no martingale. Run as risk capital only.
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, from ¥30,000 / micro account) Same engine as the verified GLACIER at 1% risk. Real MT5 (2018-2025, every tick): PF 1.78 / balance DD 3.63% / +15.6% / 50 trades. On a micro account a 0.01 lot is ~1/100 the risk — safe from ¥30,000.
| 指標 | BITCOIN COMET | TRINITY | SOLANA COMET | BITCOIN NANO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)總獲利÷總虧損。建議1.5以上 | 🏆2.77 | 2.20 | 2.72 | 2.55 |
| 年化 (CAGR/單利%)年度報酬 (顯示值由10年BT計算) | +39.9% | 🏆+52.0% | +12.9% | +2.7% |
| 最大DD帳戶最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 7.09% | 10.46% | 10.20% | 🏆2.32% |
| 勝率 | 40.1% | 🏆44.3% | 41.0% | 34.1% |
| 年交易數每年的交易筆數 | 137次 | 🏆307次 | 85次 | 44次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)風險調整後報酬 (越大越好) | 🏆5.63 | 4.97 | 1.26 | 1.16 |
| 10年單利預測 ($670起算) | $49,200 | 🏆$62,000 | $18,400 | $12,700 |
| 10年複利預測 ($670起算) | $287,700 | 🏆$658,300 | $33,800 | $13,100 |
💡 比較結果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/單利%):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 勝率:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 年交易數:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)
- 10年單利預測 ($670起算):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年複利預測 ($670起算):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)