⚖️ EA比較工具
並列比較2〜4個EA。在各指標上以醒目顯示最高值的EA。
📋 選擇要比較的EA (2/4)
TRINITY
* TRINITY - one .ex5 that trend-trades BTC+ETH+USDJPY simultaneously. ATR stop per symbol, executed by the EA (no broker-side SL - keep it running on a VPS), 1 position per symbol, no grid/no martingale. Three nearly-uncorrelated assets smooth the DD curve. Same engine family as BITCOIN COMET/MEGAMAX. Single $10k account, shipping default Standard, 7.5-yr live-terminal measurement: +1,021% / PF 1.91 / rel.DD 23.3% (equity max DD 14.1%)
ATLAS
★ ATLAS — one EA trading 5 markets: USDJPY/GBPJPY/EURJPY (MEGAMAX engine) + BTC/ETH (COMET engine). SL on every leg (JPY legs broker-side, BTC/ETH legs executed by the EA - keep it running), no grid/martingale. Single-account compounding backtest (2019-2026, 7.5yr, M1 every-tick): every year positive, +4,941% cumulative (about 69% CAGR), PF 1.48, rel.DD 26.3% (equity max DD 19.7%), 1,193 trades at 1% risk per leg. MT5 & MT4.
| 指標 | TRINITY | ATLAS |
|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)總獲利÷總虧損。建議1.5以上 | 🏆1.91 | 1.48 |
| 年化 (CAGR/單利%)年度報酬 (顯示值由10年BT計算) | +38.1% | 🏆+68.8% |
| 最大DD帳戶最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 🏆23.30% | 26.30% |
顯示其餘5項指標（勝率·交易次數·卡瑪比率·10年試算）
| 指標 | TRINITY | ATLAS |
|---|---|---|
| 勝率 | 🏆43.1% | 33.2% |
| 年交易數每年的交易筆數 | 420次 | 🏆1193次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)風險調整後報酬 (越大越好) | 1.64 | 🏆2.62 |
| 10年單利預測 ($670起算) | $48,100 | 🏆$78,800 |
| 10年複利預測 ($670起算) | $112,127 | 🏆$1,878,000 |
💡 比較結果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 年化 (CAGR/單利%):ATLAS (Multi-Asset)
- 最大DD:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 勝率:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 年交易數:ATLAS (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):ATLAS (Multi-Asset)
- 10年單利預測 ($670起算):ATLAS (Multi-Asset)
- 10年複利預測 ($670起算):ATLAS (Multi-Asset)