⚖️ EA比較工具
並列比較2〜4個EA。在各指標上以醒目顯示最高值的EA。
📋 選擇要比較的EA (4/4)
BITCOIN GLACIER
★ BITCOIN GLACIER EA (BTCUSD D1 daily trend, low-DD quality build) Real MT5 (2018-2025) PF=2.52 / DD=4.8% / +56% / 44 trades. Same engine as COMET on the daily TF = half the DD, higher PF, conservative. Robust across both OOS halves.
TRINITY
★ TRINITY — 用單一 .ex5 同時趨勢交易 BTC+ETH+USDJPY 的單一多資產EA。每個商品硬停損(= ATR追蹤寬度)、每商品一倉、無網格、無馬丁。三種資產近乎零相關，平滑回落。與 BITCOIN COMET / MEGAMAX 同一引擎系列。單一$10k帳戶、標準風險(2/2/0.5)、Exness實盤測試2019-2025：+1,778% / PF 2.20 / 最大回落10.46% / 307筆。MT5 · MT4。
BITCOIN COIL
★ BITCOIN COIL EA (BTCUSD H4 squeeze breakout) Real MT5 8.0yr (2018-2025/every-tick) PF=3.34 / DD=16.6% / +607% total / 76 trades / Sharpe 2.11 (robust IS3.70/OOS3.10, hard SL, no grid)
SOLANA COMET
SOLANA COMET EA (SOLUSD H4 dual-direction Donchian trend) — same proven COMET engine as Bitcoin, applied to Solana. Dukascopy 2021-2026: PF 2.72 / +84% / maxDD 10.2% / 85 trades, both directions. ⚠ High variance: the edge is concentrated in trending/volatile SOL regimes (2021-2023); 2024-2025 were ~flat. Hard SL, no grid, no martingale. Run as risk capital only.
| 指標 | BITCOIN GLACIER | TRINITY | BITCOIN COIL | SOLANA COMET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)總獲利÷總虧損。建議1.5以上 | 2.52 | 2.20 | 🏆3.34 | 2.72 |
| 年化 (CAGR/單利%)年度報酬 (顯示值由10年BT計算) | +5.7% | 🏆+52.0% | +27.5% | +12.9% |
| 最大DD帳戶最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 🏆4.84% | 10.46% | 16.63% | 10.20% |
| 勝率 | 34.1% | 44.3% | 🏆51.3% | 41.0% |
| 年交易數每年的交易筆數 | 44次 | 🏆307次 | 76次 | 85次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)風險調整後報酬 (越大越好) | 1.18 | 🏆4.97 | 1.65 | 1.26 |
| 10年單利預測 ($670起算) | $15,700 | 🏆$62,000 | $37,500 | $18,400 |
| 10年複利預測 ($670起算) | $17,500 | 🏆$658,300 | $113,700 | $33,800 |
💡 比較結果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN COIL (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/單利%):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN GLACIER (BTCUSD)
- 勝率:BITCOIN COIL (BTCUSD)
- 年交易數:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年單利預測 ($670起算):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年複利預測 ($670起算):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)