⚖️ EA比较工具
并列比较2〜4个EA。在各项指标中以高亮显示最高值的EA。
📋 选择要比较的EA (3/4)
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, micro-account) Honest M1 every-tick 8.5yr: PF 4.50 / equity DD 7.0% (balance 2.2%) / +38.5% / 35 trades. Small-capital variant of the GLACIER engine
BITCOIN GLACIER
★ BITCOIN GLACIER EA (BTCUSD D1 daily trend) MT5 8yr (2018-2025, every-tick): PF 5.56 / eqDD 13.8% / +92% / 28 trades. COMET engine on daily bars = low DD, high PF, conservative. +3.1% verified on 2026 real ticks
TRINITY
★ TRINITY — one .ex5 that trend-trades BTC+ETH+USDJPY simultaneously. Hard SL per symbol (ATR trail), 1 position per symbol, no grid/no martingale. Three nearly-uncorrelated assets smooth the DD curve. Same engine family as BITCOIN COMET/MEGAMAX. Honest every-tick backtest, single $10k account, standard risk (2/2/0.5), 2019-2025 (v2.0 leg-sync): +897% / PF 1.95 / max balance DD 9.1% / 424 trades / both IS & OOS halves profitable. MT5 & MT4.
| 指标 | BITCOIN NANO | BITCOIN GLACIER | TRINITY |
|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)总盈利÷总亏损。建议1.5以上 | 4.50 | 🏆5.56 | 1.95 |
| 年化 (CAGR/单利%)年度回报 (显示值由10年BT计算) | +3.9% | +8.5% | 🏆+38.9% |
| 最大DD账户的最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 🏆6.95% | 13.79% | 9.10% |
| 胜率 | 51.4% | 🏆57.1% | 43.2% |
| 年交易数每年的交易次数 | 35次 | 28次 | 🏆389次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)风险调整后回报 (越大越好) | 0.56 | 0.62 | 🏆4.27 |
| 10年单利预测 ($670起点) | ¥100,080 | ¥133,200 | 🏆¥352,080 |
| 10年复利预测 ($670起点) | ¥105,840 | ¥162,720 | 🏆¥1,922,400 |
💡 比较结果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN GLACIER (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/单利%):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 胜率:BITCOIN GLACIER (BTCUSD)
- 年交易数:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年单利预测 ($670起点):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年复利预测 ($670起点):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)