⚖️ EA比较工具
并列比较2〜4个EA。在各项指标中以高亮显示最高值的EA。
📋 选择要比较的EA (3/4)
TRINITY
* TRINITY - one .ex5 that trend-trades BTC+ETH+USDJPY simultaneously. Hard SL per symbol (ATR trail), 1 position per symbol, no grid/no martingale. Three nearly-uncorrelated assets smooth the DD curve. Same engine family as BITCOIN COMET/MEGAMAX. Single $10k account, shipping default Standard, 7.5-yr live-terminal measurement: +1,021% / PF 1.91 / 14.1% equity DD
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, micro-account) Honest M1 every-tick 8.5yr: PF 4.50 / equity DD 7.0% (balance 2.2%) / +38.5% / 35 trades. Small-capital variant of the GLACIER engine
MEGAMAX DON GBPJPY
🔥 Ultra-aggressive default / USDJPY H1 Donchian trailing, compounding / Dukascopy 100% real-tick 9.4y ×22.6 (+2,155%) / PF1.55 / rel.DD 58.6% (equity max DD 16.3%) / hard SL, no grid, no martingale ⚠ deep-DD, advanced users. Lower tiers via bundled presets
| 指标 | TRINITY | BITCOIN NANO | MEGAMAX DON GBPJPY |
|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)总盈利÷总亏损。建议1.5以上 | 1.91 | 🏆4.50 | 1.32 |
| 年化 (CAGR/单利%)年度回报 (显示值由10年BT计算) | 🏆+38.1% | +3.9% | +27.4% |
| 最大DD账户的最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 14.14% | 🏆6.95% | 57.00% |
| 胜率 | 43.1% | 🏆51.4% | 42.6% |
| 年交易数每年的交易次数 | 🏆420次 | 35次 | 256次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)风险调整后回报 (越大越好) | 🏆2.69 | 0.56 | 0.48 |
| 10年单利预测 ($670起点) | 🏆¥346,320 | ¥100,080 | ¥269,280 |
| 10年复利预测 ($670起点) | 🏆¥807,314 | ¥105,840 | ¥702,000 |
💡 比较结果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/单利%):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 胜率:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年交易数:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年单利预测 ($670起点):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年复利预测 ($670起点):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)