⚖️ EA比较工具
并列比较2〜4个EA。在各项指标中以高亮显示最高值的EA。
📋 选择要比较的EA (4/4)
GOLD PIVOT
★ GOLD PIVOT v2.0 EA (XAUUSD, ML entry gate + hard SL / no grid / no martingale) Dukascopy real ticks 4.5yr (2022-2026.06): PF 1.61 / equity DD 15.9% / +41% (Standard tier) / win 90.6% / 203 trades. Trained 2022-24, validated untouched 2025/26 (walk-forward). Yearly +9/-7/+14/+9/+12, one losing year
SOLANA COMET
⚠ SOLUSD H4 trend (caution) — the 2026-07 honest every-tick re-verification could not reproduce the nominal figures (PF 2.72; no trades on the current feed). Treat old figures as reference only; new deployment not recommended until re-verified
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, micro-account) Honest M1 every-tick 8.5yr: PF 4.50 / equity DD 7.0% (balance 2.2%) / +38.5% / 35 trades. Small-capital variant of the GLACIER engine
BITCOIN COMET
★ BITCOIN COMET EA (BTCUSD H4 trend, both directions) MT5 8yr (2018-2025, every-tick): PF 2.38 / DD 8.3% / +328% / 128 trades / IS/OOS robust (PF 3.71/2.13), +8.1% verified on 2026 real ticks
| 指标 | GOLD PIVOT | SOLANA COMET | BITCOIN NANO | BITCOIN COMET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)总盈利÷总亏损。建议1.5以上 | 1.61 | 2.72 | 🏆4.50 | 2.38 |
| 年化 (CAGR/单利%)年度回报 (显示值由10年BT计算) | +8.0% | +12.9% | +3.9% | 🏆+19.9% |
| 最大DD账户的最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 15.90% | 10.20% | 🏆6.95% | 8.33% |
| 胜率 | 🏆90.6% | 41.0% | 51.4% | 46.1% |
| 年交易数每年的交易次数 | 🏆203次 | 85次 | 35次 | 128次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)风险调整后回报 (越大越好) | 0.50 | 1.26 | 0.56 | 🏆2.39 |
| 10年单利预测 ($670起点) | ¥129,600 | ¥132,480 | ¥100,080 | 🏆¥215,280 |
| 10年复利预测 ($670起点) | ¥155,520 | ¥243,360 | ¥105,840 | 🏆¥442,800 |
💡 比较结果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/单利%):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 胜率:GOLD PIVOT (XAUUSD)
- 年交易数:GOLD PIVOT (XAUUSD)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)
- 10年单利预测 ($670起点):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)
- 10年复利预测 ($670起点):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)