⚖️ EA比较工具
并列比较2〜4个EA。在各项指标中以高亮显示最高值的EA。
📋 选择要比较的EA (4/4)
GOLD PIVOT
★ GOLD PIVOT v2.0 EA (XAUUSD, ML entry gate + hard SL / no grid / no martingale) Dukascopy real ticks 4.5yr (2022-2026.06): PF 1.58 / equity DD 49% / +191% (Standard tier) / win 90.6% / 203 trades. Trained 2022-24, validated untouched 2025/26 (walk-forward). Yearly +9/-7/+14/+9/+12, one losing year
TRINITY
* TRINITY - one .ex5 that trend-trades BTC+ETH+USDJPY simultaneously. Hard SL per symbol (ATR trail), 1 position per symbol, no grid/no martingale. Three nearly-uncorrelated assets smooth the DD curve. Same engine family as BITCOIN COMET/MEGAMAX. Single $10k account, shipping default Standard, 7.5-yr live-terminal measurement: +1,021% / PF 1.91 / 14.1% equity DD
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, micro-account) Honest M1 every-tick 8.5yr: PF 4.50 / equity DD 7.0% (balance 2.2%) / +38.5% / 35 trades. Small-capital variant of the GLACIER engine
BITCOIN COMET
★ BITCOIN COMET EA (BTCUSD H4 trend, both directions) MT5 8yr (2018-2025, every-tick): PF 2.19 / DD 18.2% / +3,700% / 128 trades / IS/OOS robust (PF 3.71/2.13), +8.1% verified on 2026 real ticks
| 指标 | GOLD PIVOT | TRINITY | BITCOIN NANO | BITCOIN COMET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)总盈利÷总亏损。建议1.5以上 | 1.58 | 1.91 | 🏆4.50 | 2.19 |
| 年化 (CAGR/单利%)年度回报 (显示值由10年BT计算) | +27.5% | +38.1% | +3.9% | 🏆+57.6% |
| 最大DD账户的最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 49.00% | 14.14% | 🏆6.95% | 18.20% |
| 胜率 | 🏆90.6% | 43.1% | 51.4% | 46.1% |
| 年交易数每年的交易次数 | 203次 | 🏆420次 | 35次 | 128次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)风险调整后回报 (越大越好) | 0.56 | 2.69 | 0.56 | 🏆3.16 |
| 10年单利预测 ($670起点) | ¥209,520 | ¥346,320 | ¥100,080 | 🏆¥403,776 |
| 10年复利预测 ($670起点) | ¥209,520 | ¥807,314 | ¥105,840 | 🏆¥2,736,504 |
💡 比较结果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/单利%):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 胜率:GOLD PIVOT (XAUUSD)
- 年交易数:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)
- 10年单利预测 ($670起点):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)
- 10年复利预测 ($670起点):BITCOIN COMET (BTCUSD)