⚖️ EA比较工具
并列比较2〜4个EA。在各项指标中以高亮显示最高值的EA。
📋 选择要比较的EA (4/4)
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, micro-account) Honest M1 every-tick 8.5yr: PF 4.50 / equity DD 7.0% (balance 2.2%) / +38.5% / 35 trades. Small-capital variant of the GLACIER engine
TRINITY
* TRINITY - one .ex5 that trend-trades BTC+ETH+USDJPY simultaneously. Hard SL per symbol (ATR trail), 1 position per symbol, no grid/no martingale. Three nearly-uncorrelated assets smooth the DD curve. Same engine family as BITCOIN COMET/MEGAMAX. Single $10k account, shipping default Standard, 7.5-yr live-terminal measurement: +1,021% / PF 1.91 / 14.1% equity DD
BITCOIN COIL
★ BITCOIN COIL EA (BTCUSD H4 volatility-squeeze breakout) 8.5yr M1 every-tick (2018-2026.6): PF 3.59 / eqDD 21.4% (balance 4.8%) / +2,251% / 57 trades (v1.60 genetic walk-forward, both IS/OOS windows PF3+). Hard SL, no grid
SOLANA COMET
⚠ SOLUSD H4 trend (caution) — the 2026-07 honest every-tick re-verification could not reproduce the nominal figures (PF 2.72; no trades on the current feed). Treat old figures as reference only; new deployment not recommended until re-verified
| 指标 | BITCOIN NANO | TRINITY | BITCOIN COIL | SOLANA COMET |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)总盈利÷总亏损。建议1.5以上 | 🏆4.50 | 1.91 | 3.59 | 2.72 |
| 年化 (CAGR/单利%)年度回报 (显示值由10年BT计算) | +3.9% | +38.1% | 🏆+45.0% | +12.9% |
| 最大DD账户的最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 🏆6.95% | 14.14% | 21.40% | 10.20% |
| 胜率 | 🏆51.4% | 43.1% | 47.4% | 41.0% |
| 年交易数每年的交易次数 | 35次 | 🏆420次 | 57次 | 85次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)风险调整后回报 (越大越好) | 0.56 | 🏆2.69 | 2.10 | 1.26 |
| 10年单利预测 ($670起点) | ¥100,080 | ¥346,320 | 🏆¥396,000 | ¥132,480 |
| 10年复利预测 ($670起点) | ¥105,840 | ¥807,314 | 🏆¥1,692,720 | ¥243,360 |
💡 比较结果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/单利%):BITCOIN COIL (BTCUSD)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 胜率:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年交易数:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年单利预测 ($670起点):BITCOIN COIL (BTCUSD)
- 10年复利预测 ($670起点):BITCOIN COIL (BTCUSD)