⚖️ EA比较工具
并列比较2〜4个EA。在各项指标中以高亮显示最高值的EA。
📋 选择要比较的EA (4/4)
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, micro-account) Honest M1 every-tick 8.5yr: PF 4.50 / equity DD 7.0% (balance 2.2%) / +38.5% / 35 trades. Small-capital variant of the GLACIER engine
ETHEREUM EA
★ ETHEREUM EA (ETHUSD H4 trend, both directions) Dukascopy real ticks 7.5yr (2019-2026): PF 3.98 / eqDD 8.5% (balance 6.3%) / +223% / 93 trades (v1.30 genetic walk-forward EC23/ATR3/BM1.25 - optimized on 2018-23, validated untouched on 2024-26, both windows PF3+)
SOLANA COMET
⚠ SOLUSD H4 trend (caution) — the 2026-07 honest every-tick re-verification could not reproduce the nominal figures (PF 2.72; no trades on the current feed). Treat old figures as reference only; new deployment not recommended until re-verified
TRINITY
* TRINITY - one .ex5 that trend-trades BTC+ETH+USDJPY simultaneously. Hard SL per symbol (ATR trail), 1 position per symbol, no grid/no martingale. Three nearly-uncorrelated assets smooth the DD curve. Same engine family as BITCOIN COMET/MEGAMAX. Single $10k account, shipping default Standard, 7.5-yr live-terminal measurement: +1,021% / PF 1.91 / 14.1% equity DD
| 指标 | BITCOIN NANO | ETHEREUM EA | SOLANA COMET | TRINITY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)总盈利÷总亏损。建议1.5以上 | 🏆4.50 | 3.98 | 2.72 | 1.91 |
| 年化 (CAGR/单利%)年度回报 (显示值由10年BT计算) | +3.9% | +16.9% | +12.9% | 🏆+38.1% |
| 最大DD账户的最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 🏆6.95% | 14.00% | 10.20% | 14.14% |
| 胜率 | 🏆51.4% | 43.0% | 41.0% | 43.1% |
| 年交易数每年的交易次数 | 35次 | 93次 | 85次 | 🏆420次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)风险调整后回报 (越大越好) | 0.56 | 1.21 | 1.26 | 🏆2.69 |
| 10年单利预测 ($670起点) | ¥100,080 | ¥193,680 | ¥132,480 | 🏆¥346,320 |
| 10年复利预测 ($670起点) | ¥105,840 | ¥232,560 | ¥243,360 | 🏆¥807,314 |
💡 比较结果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/单利%):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 胜率:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年交易数:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年单利预测 ($670起点):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年复利预测 ($670起点):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)