⚖️ EA比较工具
并列比较2〜4个EA。在各项指标中以高亮显示最高值的EA。
📋 选择要比较的EA (4/4)
BITCOIN NANO
★ BITCOIN NANO EA (BTCUSD D1, micro-account) Honest M1 every-tick 8.5yr: PF 4.50 / equity DD 7.0% (balance 2.2%) / +38.5% / 35 trades. Small-capital variant of the GLACIER engine
BITCOIN COMET
★ BITCOIN COMET EA (BTCUSD H4 trend, both directions) MT5 8yr (2018-2025, every-tick): PF 2.38 / DD 8.3% / +328% / 128 trades / IS/OOS robust (PF 3.71/2.13), +8.1% verified on 2026 real ticks
TRINITY
★ TRINITY — one .ex5 that trend-trades BTC+ETH+USDJPY simultaneously. Hard SL per symbol (ATR trail), 1 position per symbol, no grid/no martingale. Three nearly-uncorrelated assets smooth the DD curve. Same engine family as BITCOIN COMET/MEGAMAX. Honest every-tick backtest, single $10k account, standard risk (2/2/0.5), 2019-2025 (v2.0 leg-sync): +897% / PF 1.95 / max balance DD 9.1% / 424 trades / both IS & OOS halves profitable. MT5 & MT4.
BITCOIN COIL
★ BITCOIN COIL EA (BTCUSD H4 volatility-squeeze breakout) 8.5yr M1 every-tick (2018-2026.6): PF 4.14 / eqDD 8.6% (balance 4.8%) / +382% / 57 trades (v1.60 genetic walk-forward, both IS/OOS windows PF3+). Hard SL, no grid
| 指标 | BITCOIN NANO | BITCOIN COMET | TRINITY | BITCOIN COIL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF (Profit Factor)总盈利÷总亏损。建议1.5以上 | 🏆4.50 | 2.38 | 1.95 | 4.14 |
| 年化 (CAGR/单利%)年度回报 (显示值由10年BT计算) | +3.9% | +19.9% | 🏆+38.9% | +20.3% |
| 最大DD账户的最大下跌率 (越小越好) | 🏆6.95% | 8.33% | 9.10% | 8.59% |
| 胜率 | 🏆51.4% | 46.1% | 43.2% | 47.4% |
| 年交易数每年的交易次数 | 35次 | 128次 | 🏆389次 | 57次 |
| Calmar (年化÷DD)风险调整后回报 (越大越好) | 0.56 | 2.39 | 🏆4.27 | 2.36 |
| 10年单利预测 ($670起点) | ¥100,080 | ¥215,280 | 🏆¥352,080 | ¥218,160 |
| 10年复利预测 ($670起点) | ¥105,840 | ¥442,800 | 🏆¥1,922,400 | ¥457,200 |
💡 比较结果摘要
- PF (Profit Factor):BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年化 (CAGR/单利%):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 最大DD:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 胜率:BITCOIN NANO (BTCUSD)
- 年交易数:TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- Calmar (年化÷DD):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年单利预测 ($670起点):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)
- 10年复利预测 ($670起点):TRINITY (Multi-Asset)